This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1538574408326182v1 43/2/178    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zafarghandi, M. R. Articles by Abbasi, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zafarghandi, M. R. Articles by Abbasi, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Varicose Veins Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) in Patients With Varicose Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) and Incompetent Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ): An Ambulatory Single Center Experience

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mrzafarghandi{at}gmail.com.

	Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate treatment results for varicose great saphenous vein (GSV) using endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in an ambulatory single center.

Material and methods: We prospectively studied 77 limbs with varicose GSV in 74 patients who were treated using 980-nm EVL with a 600-µm laser fiber and the power settings of 10-25 Watts. The patients were followed using color Doppler ultrasound.

Results: Continued closure of treated GSV was found in 98.3% of the legs evaluated at 3-week follow-up (n = 60). At 3- and 6-month intervals, 94.1% and 97% successful occlusion was achieved, respectively. The main complications of the procedure included prolonged leg pain (2 cases), hyperestheasia (one case) and lidocaine sensitivity (one case).

Conclusion: EVLA treatment of the GSV is a safe and highly effective method accompanied with few complications in midterm follow-up. It is feasible in ambulatory settings and the patients return to their daily activities early after intervention.

First published on December 16, 2008, doi:10.1177/1538574408326182

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2009;43:178.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?