This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1538574408321786v1 42/6/555    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vogel, T. R. Articles by Graham, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vogel, T. R. Articles by Graham, A. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

AAA Repair: Sociodemographic Disparities in Management and Outcomes

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tvogel{at}excite.com.

	Abstract

Objective: To evaluate sociodemographic influences on utilization and outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

Methods: Secondary data analysis of the State Inpatient Databases for New Jersey.

Results: Between 2001 and 2006, a total of 6227 adult subjects (mean [SD] age, 73.3 [8.3] years; 77.6% male) underwent AAA repair (3167 EVAR and 3060 open surgery [OS]). Patients receiving EVAR were older than those undergoing OS (mean [SD] age, 74.2 [8.0] vs 72.4 [8.6] years) (<I>P </I>< .001). Men were 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.77) times more likely to receive EVAR than women. White subjects had the same odds of undergoing EVAR as black subjects, and white subjects had 1.60 (95% CI, 1.29-2.06) times higher odds of receiving EVAR than Hispanics. Subjects with Medicare coverage were 3.90 (96% CI, 2.28-6.59) times more likely to receive EVAR than uninsured subjects. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that older age, male sex, and Medicare coverage were significantly associated with increased utilization of EVAR and that uninsured subjects and Hispanics are less likely to receive EVAR. Octogenarians and black subjects (odds ratios: 3.69 CI: 2.31-5.91, and 2.59 CI: 1.47-4.54 respectively) had significantly greater likelihood of death after elective AAA repair.

Conclusions: For AAA repair, significant sociodemographic disparities exist in the use of endovascular technology and in mortality. The risk of death after elective AAA repair was significantly greater for black subjects. Further analysis is warranted to delineate inequalities of vascular care for AAA and to assist in formulating policy to address these disparities.

First published on August 11, 2008, doi:10.1177/1538574408321786

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2009;42:555.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?