|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Entrapment of a Cerebral Embolic Protection Device
A Case Report
Kimberly Shilling, MS
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
Barry F. Uretsky, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
Glenn C. Hunter, MD
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, gchunter{at}utmb.edu
Cerebral protection devices have significantly reduced the incidence of embolic events in patients undergoing carotid stenting. With the increasing availability of such devices an awareness of the potential complications associated with their deployment is essential. Here we report a patient with entrapment of a filter device within a carotid stent that required surgical removal. The mechanisms underlying this complication and measures to prevent its occurrence are discussed.
References
- Alberts MJ: Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy (abstract). Stroke 32:325-325, 2001.
- Alberts MJ, McCann R, Smith TP, et al: A randomized trial of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: Study design. J Neurovasc Dis 2:228-234, 1997.
- Wholey MH, Wholey MH, Jarmolowski CR, et al: Endovascular stents for carotid artery occlusive disease. J Endovasc Surg 4:326-338, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wholey MH, Jarmolowski CR, Wholey M, et al: Carotid artery stent placementready for prime time? J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1-10, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wholey MH, Wholey MH: History and current status of endovascular management for the extracranial carotid and supra-aortic vessels. J Endovasc Ther 11(suppl 2):II 43-II61, 2004.
- Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al: Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493-1501, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM: Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: A Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905-911, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Setacci F, et al: Protected carotid stenting: Clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke 34:1936-1941, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Eckert B, Zeumer H: Editorial commentCarotid artery stenting with or without protection devices? Strong opinions, poor evidence! Stroke 34:1941-1943, 2003.[Free Full Text]
- Parodi JC, Ferreira LM, Sicard G, et al: Cerebral protection during carotid stenting using flow reversal. J Vasc Surg 41:416-422, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Reimers B, Schluter M, Castriota F, et al: Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients. Am J Med 116:217-222, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schmidt A, Diederich KW, Scheinert S, et al: Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1966-1969, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Powell RJ, Schermerhorn M, Nolan B, et al: Early results of carotid stent placement for treatment of extracranial carotid bifurcation occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 39:1193-1199, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Choi HM, Hobson RW, Goldstein J, et al: Technical challenges in a program of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 40:746-751, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, et al: Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: A systematic review of the literature. Stroke 34:813-819, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 3,
229-233 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440604000308

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|