|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Application of Split-Thickness Skin Graft as an Autogenous Arterial Conduit in a Goat (Capra Hircus) Model
Kullada O. Pichakron, MD
Department of Surgery, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, CA
Phiet T. Bui, MD
Department of Surgery, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, CA
Brian J. Pickard, MD
Department of Surgery, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, CA
Jon Perlstein, MD
Department of Surgery, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, CA
Derek Mathis, MD
Department of Pathology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX
Jeannie Muir-Padilla, MD
Department of Pathology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX
Daniel M. Ihnat, MD
Department of Surgery, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, CA, DIhnat{at}surgery.arizona.edu
Adequate autogenous vein is often the limiting factor in achieving a successful infrainguinal bypass. Attempts have been made to find alternative conduits; however, these alternatives have demonstrated inferior patency rates. We attempt to show that a split-thickness skin graft conduit provides a feasible autogenous arterial conduit. Neoconduits were prepared with an autogenous split-thickness skin graft (STSG) tubularized for a length of 5-6 centimeters with an appropriate caliber match to native artery. The deep dermal side of the graft was randomized to form either the external surface or the luminal surface. The neoconduit was placed as an interposition graft in the left common carotid artery. Grafts were studied in vivo with duplex ultrasonography and ex vivo by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Feasibility study involved 4 animals with grafts harvested for study at 24 hours (n= 2) and 7 days (n= 2). Two subsequent groups were studied to evaluate 3-month (n= 8) and 6-month (n= 5) patency. All grafts (n= 4) in the feasibility phase of the study were patent at the time of harvest without evidence of aneurysmal degeneration. In the subsequent 8 goats, grafts with the deep dermal side forming the extraluminal surface (n= 4) had a propensity to ulcerate and rupture or to become aneurysmal (75%). The patency rate of these grafts at 6 weeks was 25%. In contrast, grafts with the deep dermal side forming the intraluminal surface (n= 4) demonstrated 75% patency at 6 weeks. Because of these results the remaining goats underwent placement of neoconduits with the deep dermal side forming the luminal surface. These grafts maintained a patency rate of 80% at 6 months. Neoconduits implanted with a diameter greater than 1.5 times the native arterial diameter became aneurysmal. Histopathology demonstrated neointimal formation in all grafts patent for longer than 7 days. Immunohistochemical staining for Factor VIII/von Willebrands factor (vWF) was reactive in the endoluminal cells of these grafts. Immunohistochemical staining for a-smooth muscle actin demonstrated reactivity in conduits patent for greater than 1 month. Split-thickness skin may provide a feasible source for autogenous conduit in arterial reconstructions and warrants further study. Technical factors affecting patency include orientation of the deep dermal surface of the STSG and the diameter of the neoconduit at the time of implantation.
References
- Suggs WD, Sanchez LA, Woo D, et al: Endoscopically assisted in situ lower extremity bypass graft: A preliminary report of a new minimally invasive technique. J Vasc Surg 34:668-672, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Felisky CD, Paul DL, Hill ME, et al: Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Surg 183:576-579, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA, et al: Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 72:319-320, 2001.[Free Full Text]
- Kan CD, Luo CY, Yang YJ: Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest decreases leg wound complication in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. J Cardiothorac Surg 14:157-162, 1999.
- Bitondo JM, Daggett WM, Torchiana DF, et al: Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: A comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg 73:523-528, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP, Hageman JH, et al: Biologic fate of autogenous vein implants as arterial substitutes: Clinical, angiographic and histopathologic observations in femoro-popliteal operations for atherosclerosis. Ann Surg 178:232-246, 1973.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Veith FJ, Weiser RK, Gupta SK, et al: Diagnosis and management of failing lower extremity arterial reconstructions prior to graft occlusion. J Cardiovasc Surg 5:381-384, 1984.
- Whittemore AD, Clowes AW, Couch NP, et al: Secondary femoropopliteal reconstruction. Ann Surg 193:35-42, 1981.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sladen JG, Gilmour JL: Vein graft stenosis: Characteristics and effect of treatment. Am J Surg 141:549-553, 1981.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Berkowitz HD, Hobbs CL, Roberts B, et al: Value of routine vascular laboratory studies to identify vein graft stenosis. Surgery 90:971-979, 1981.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Berkowitz HD, Greenstein S, Barker CF, et al: Late failure of reversed vein bypass grafts. Ann Surg 210:782-786, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nehler MR, Moneta GL, Yeager RA, et al: Surgical treatment of threatened reversed infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 20:558-565, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mills JL: Mechanisms of vein graft failure: The location, distribution, and characteristics of lesions that predispose to graft failure. Semin Vasc Surg 6:78-91, 1993.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mills JL, Fujitani RM, Taylor SM: The characteristics and anatomic distribution of lesions that cause reversed vein graft failure: A five-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg 17:195-206, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mills JL, Harris EJ, Taylor LM, et al: The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: A study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 12:379-389, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grigg MJ, Nicolaides AN, Wolfe JH, et al: Femoro-distal vein bypass graft stenoses. Br J Surg 75:737-740, 1988.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bandyk DF, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GA, et al: Monitoring functional patency of in-situ saphenous vein bypasses: The impact of surveillance protocol and elective revision. J Vasc Surg 9:286-296, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al: Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3:104-114, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Calligaro KL, Syrek JR, Dougherty MJ, et al: Use of arm and lesser saphenous vein compared with prosthetic grafts for infrapopliteal arterial bypass: Are they worth the effort? J Vasc Surg 26:919-927, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, et al: Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: Long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg 79:348-354, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stonebridge PA, Prescott RJ, Ruckley CV: Randomized trial comparing infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting with and without vein interposition cuff at the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 26:543-550, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Harris PL, How TV, Jones DR: Prospectively randomized clinical trial to compare in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for femoropopliteal bypass. Br J Surg 74:252-255, 1987.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Harris L, Obrien-Irr M, Ricotta JJ: Long-term assessment of cryopreserved vein bypass grafting success. J Vasc Surg 33:528-532, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Baltoyannis G, Mitsis M, Nathanael C, et al: Submucosa of canine small intestine as an alternative medium-diameter autogenous arterial graft. Int Angiol 19:280-284, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Badylak FS, Lantz CG, Coffey A, et al: Small intestinal submucosa as a large diameter vascular graft in the dog. J Surg Res 47:74-80, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sandusky GE, Badylak SF, Morff RJ, et al: Histologic findings after in vivo placement of small intestine submucosal vascular grafts and saphenous vein grafts in the carotid artery in dogs. Am J Pathol 140:317-324, 1992.[Abstract]
- Lowler MR, Foster JH, Scott HW: Evaluation of canine intestinal submucosa as a vascular graft. Am J Surg 122:517-519, 1971.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Calligaro KD, Rollins DL, Friedell ML, et al: The use of split-thickness skin as an autogenous arterial conduit. Ann Vasc Surg 2:255-260, 1988.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lemson MS, Daemen MJAP, Kitslaar PJEHM, et al: A new animal model to study intimal hyperplasia in arteriovenous fistulas. J Surg Res 85:51-58, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 3,
213-222 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440604000306

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|