| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
EVAR in Small Versus Large Aneurysms: Does Size Influence Outcome?Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Grace.Wang{at}uphs.upenn.edu
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in outcome between endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) of small versus large aneurysms. Methods: A total of 192 patients from the Power-link trial were subdivided into small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA;
Key Words: AAA • EVAR • aneurysm
This version was published on June
1, 2009 Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 43, No. 3,
244-251 (2009) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
5 cm) and large AAA (>5 cm) groups. Demographics, perioperative morbidity, mortality, overall survival, and freedom from major adverse events, endoleak, aneurysm-related death, migration, and secondary procedures were assessed. Aneurysmal involvement of the iliacs as well as neck length and angulation was compared between groups. Results: Perioperative morbidity (P = 1.000), mortality (P = .4603), and extent of iliac involvement did not differ between groups (P = .2260). The necks in small AAA were longer (P = .0028) and less angulated (P < .0001). There was no difference in overall survival (P = .6066), freedom from major adverse events (P = .7842), endoleak, (P = .1832), migration (P = .5765), aneurysm-related death (P = .4728), or need for secondary procedures (P = .2323). Conclusion: Under controlled conditions of patient and device selection, there is no significant difference in outcome for EVAR of small versus large AAA.