| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Longitudinal Outcomes After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsRobert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of Vascular Surgery, New Brunswick, New Jersey, vogelto{at}undnj.edu
Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Objective: Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) is increasingly used, but there is insufficient evaluation of long-term outcomes. Method: Retrospective cohort study using the linked Washington State hospital discharge database. Result: 3,350 patients underwent elective repair of AAA (1181 EVAR) between 2000 and 2005. EVAR patients were older and had higher comorbidity scores. The 30-day readmission rate after EVAR was 11.6%. The 30-day readmissions included cardiac complications (18.5%) and device complications (10.4%). 46% of the 30-day readmissions after EVAR underwent procedures: abdominal/ iliac angiography (7.4%), angioplasty (8.9%), and device revision (8.2%). Mean time to late interventions was 611 days. Conclusion: Readmission, reintervention, and complication rates after EVAR occur more commonly than previously described. Cardiac complications were the most common readmission. Almost half of the 30-day readmissions required a secondary intervention. Long-term complications after EVAR occurred before two years. Population-based assessment may be more reflective of "real world" complication rates after EVAR.
Key Words: abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair outcomes complications
This version was published on October
1, 2008 Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 42, No. 5,
412-419 (2008) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||