SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1538574407312648v1
42/2/150    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Back, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bandyk, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Back, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bandyk, D. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dialysis
*Kidney Failure
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Expected Flow Parameters Within Hemodialysis Access and Selection for Remedial Intervention of Nonmaturing Conduits

Martin R. Back, MD

Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, University of South Florida Health, mback{at}health.usf.edu

Maureen Maynard, RVT

Noninvasive Vascular Laboratory, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital Tampa, Florida

Adam Winkler

Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, University of South Florida Health

Dennis F. Bandyk, MD

Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, University of South Florida Health

Background Persistent poor patency rates of arteriovenous fistulae and bridge grafts for dialysis access prompted us to investigate whether flow parameters derived from an initial postconstruction, precannulation duplex study could predict access longevity or direct remedial procedures to salvage nonmaturing conduits.

Methods We analyzed 125 consecutive dialysis access conduits (34 forearm fistulae, 53 arm fistulae, 38 prosthetic bridge grafts, 108 patients, 82 male/26 female, average age 58 years) over the past 5 years having early (2 to 8 weeks) duplex scanning done prior to attempted hemodialysis cannulation. Velocity waveforms were recorded in the arterial inflow, arterial and venous anastomoses, mid-conduit, and in the venous outflow with averaging of volume flow rate (product of average velocity and cross-sectional area) measured at 3 mid-conduit sites. Conduits were deemed "adequate" for dialysis cannulation or "nonmaturing" by the presence of detected high-grade stenoses (peak systolic velocity >400cm/s, velocity ratio >3, and minimal diameter <2 to 3 mm) and subjected to remedial interventions (endovascular or open). Subsequent access function for hemodialysis use and late patency were recorded and correlated with early duplex findings.

Results Average flow rates (forearm fistula 784 ± 623 mL/min, arm fistula 1400 ± 850, bridge graft 1270 ± 604) and mid-conduit peak-systolic velocities (215 ± 214 cm/s forearm fistula vs 312 ± 194 arm fistula) differed between conduit type and location. Remedial interventions were needed in 10 (26%) bridge grafts and 18 (21%) fistulae "nonmaturing" due to occlusive lesions. Conduit flow rates differentiated "nonmaturing" (606 ± 769 mL/min) and "maturing" (1140 ± 857) fistulae (P = .01). A threshold conduit flow rate of 800 mL/min better discriminated failing and functional fistulae and bridge grafts (accuracy 77%) than a flow rate greater or less than 500 mL/min (accuracy 67%). Remedial interventions doubled average flow rates of "nonmaturing" accesses (from 605 to 1159 mL/min) to values similar to "mature, functional" conduits (1374 mL/min) and facilitated a mean duration of patency (12.9 months) equivalent to conduits not needing remedial interventions (11.5 months).

Conclusions Duplex-derived hemodynamic parameters characterized early dialysis access conduit function, prognosticated access patency, guided necessary remedial interventions, and facilitated favorable access longevity.

Key Words: hemodialysis access • hemodynamic parameters • conduit flow rate • duplex ultrasonography

This version was published on May 1, 2008

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 42, No. 2, 150-158 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1538574407312648


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Langer, C. Heiss, N. Paulus, N. Bektas, G. Mommertz, Z. Rowinska, R. Westenfeld, M. J. Jacobs, M. Fries, T. A. Koeppel, et al.
Functional and structural response of arterialized femoral veins in a rodent AV fistula model
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2201 - 2206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement