This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ploeg, A. J. Articles by Breslau, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ploeg, A. J. Articles by Breslau, P. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Incidence of Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room After Peripheral Arterial Bypass Surgery and Its Value as Indicator of Quality of Care

Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague, arianneploeg{at}hotmail.com

Chris P. E. Lange, MD

Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague

Jan-Willem Lardenoye, MD

Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Paul J. Breslau, MD

Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague

Background In recent years, a growing need has arisen to define possible indicators of quality of care.

Methods To examine whether unplanned return to the operating room within 30 days after the initial procedure could serve as an indicator to assess quality of care in peripheral arterial bypass surgery, all bypass procedures performed between January 1996 and January 2004 were evaluated. Data were obtained from a prospectively kept hospital registration system.

Results A total of 607 consecutive procedures were performed in 468 patients. The overall unexpected return to the operating room rate was 11.2%. Patients requiring peripheral arterial bypass surgery for critical ischemia with gangrene were significantly more at risk for an unplanned reoperation (20.2%) than patients with disabling claudication (2.1%) (P < .0001). Patients requiring femorocrural bypass surgery (24.2%) were also more at risk than patients with a suprageniculate bypass procedure (5.2%) (P < .0001).

Conclusions Unplanned return to the operating room within 30 days after the initial operation can be a useful indicator of quality of care after peripheral arterial bypass surgery. However, a prospective, well-defined registration system to collect all data is essential. Furthermore, the severity of peripheral arterial disease and the type of procedure performed should be taken into account.

Key Words: quality of care • reoperations • vascular surgery

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 42, No. 1, 19-24 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1538574407306793


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?