This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, O. N. Articles by Gillespie, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, O. N. Articles by Gillespie, D. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Arteriography in the Delayed Evaluation of Wartime Extremity Injuries

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Charles J. Fox, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Sean O'Donnell, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Michael Weber, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Eric Adams, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Mitchell Cox, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Reagan Quan, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Norm Rich, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

David L. Gillespie, MD

Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, david.gillespie{at}na.amedd.army.mil, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uniformed Service University, Bethesda, Maryland

Recent combat casualties have stimulated a reassessment of the principles of management of high-risk extremity injuries with a normal vascular examination. Rapid evacuations have presented numerous U.S. soldiers to our service for evaluation in the early postinjury period. The objective of this single-institution report is to analyze the application of liberal arteriography in the delayed evaluation of modern wartime extremity injuries. Data from consecutive wartime evacuees evaluated for extremity injuries between March 2002 and November 2004 were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Analysis was focused on arteriography and its role in our current diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Information including injury sites and mechanisms, associated trauma, battlefield repairs performed, arteriography technique, complications, findings, and need for further intervention were reviewed. Indications for imaging in this high-risk group included proximity to vascular structures, abnormal or equivocal physical examination, adjunctive operative planning, and evaluation of battlefield repair. Ninety-nine of 179 patients (55%) with extremity injuries underwent arteriography, with 142 total limbs studied. The majority of them were wounded by explosive devices (82%) or high-velocity rifle munitions (14%). Abnormalities were found in 75 of 142 (52.8%) imaged limbs in 46 of the 99 (46.5%) patients. Twenty-four of these patients (52.2%) required additional operative intervention. Occult vascular injury findings were associated with bony fracture in 68% and nerve injury in 16%. Median delay between injury and stateside evaluation was 6 days. Two thirds of these soldiers presented with a normal physical examination result. There were no access site complications or incidents of contrast-induced acute renal failure. The liberal application of arteriography is a low-risk method to provide high-yield data in the delayed vascular evaluation of extremities injured from modern military munitions. Physical examination findings remain the most useful indicator, but a normal examination can be misleading and should not guide the decision for invasive imaging. Lesions are found and require further intervention at a higher rate than expected from the typical civilian trauma experience.

Key Words: arteriography • arterial injuries • extremity injuries • high-velocity gunshot wounds • traumatic arteriovenous fistula • proximal injuries

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 3, 217-224 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1538574407299601


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?