This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ali, A. T. Articles by Eidt, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ali, A. T. Articles by Eidt, J. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Percutaneous Isolated Limb Perfusion with Thrombolytics for Severe Limb Ischemia

Venkat R. Kalapatapu, MD

Shelly Bledsoe, MD

Mohammed M. Moursi, MD

John F. Eidt, MD

Little Rock, AR

Patients with severe tibioperoneal disease are poor candidates for a distal bypass. Absence of a distal target, lack of conduit, or multiple medical problems can make these patients a prohibitive risk for revascularization. Acute on chronic ischemia in this group poses a greater challenge. Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemia can be prolonged and carries a significant risk of bleeding if continued beyond 24 hours. However, if the ischemic limbs can be isolated from the systemic circulation, a higher dose of the lytic agent can be given with lower risk. These are the initial results of a series of 10 patients who underwent percutaneous isolated limb perfusion with a high dose of thrombolytics for severe ischemia. Ten patients (lower extremity 8 and upper extremity 2) presented with severe limb-threatening ischemia. Mean ankle/brachial index (ABI) was 0.15 for the lower extremity, and there were no recordable digital pressures in patients with upper extremity ischemia. No distal target was visible on the initial arteriogram. These patients were then taken to the operating room, and under anesthesia, catheters were placed in an antegrade fashion via femoral approach in the popliteal artery and vein percutaneously. For upper extremity, the catheters were placed in the brachial artery and vein. A proximal tourniquet was then applied. This isolated the limb from the systemic circulation. Heparinized saline was infused through the arterial catheter while the venous catheter was left open. A closed loop or an isolated limb perfusion was confirmed when effluent became clear coming out of the venous port. A high dose of thrombolytic agent (urokinase 500,000 to 1,000,000 U) was infused into the isolated limb via the arterial catheter and drained out of the venous catheter. After 45 minutes, arterial flow was reestablished. In 4 patients, Reopro ^® was used in addition to thrombolytics. Postprocedure angiograms showed minimal changes, but patients exhibited marked clinical improvement. The ABI changed from 0.15 to 0.5 in the lower extremity and near-normal digital pressures in upper extremity ischemia. Limb salvage and symptomatic relief at 6 months was 90%. All patients except one were kept on anticoagulation postoperatively. No bleeding complications were observed from the procedure. Percutaneous isolated limb perfusion brought symptomatic relief to patients presenting with acute on chronic limb ischemia. This can be an alternate option for patients facing amputation with no revascularization options.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 6, 491-497 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900605


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?