This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Welborn, M. B. Articles by Clagett, G. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Welborn, M. B., III Articles by Clagett, G. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Endovascular Repair of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Paradigm Shift?

Franklin S. Yau, MD

J. Gregory Modrall, MD

Department of Surgery, and the Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Jorge A. Lopez, MD

Stephen Floyd, BSRT

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

R. James Valentine, MD

G. Patrick Clagett, MD

Department of Surgery, and the Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Recent reports have documented poor long-term results following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). EVAR of small AAAs may result in improved long-term results compared to large AAAs. It is not known whether the frequency of anatomic suitability for EVAR is increased for small compared to large AAAs. This study compared the anatomic suitability of large and small AAAs for EVAR in an unselected patient population. Radiology reports for all computed tomography (CT) scans in a single hospital over a recent 3-year period were reviewed. AAAs diagnosed by contrasted CT scans with cuts >7 mm were excluded. Suitability for EVAR was determined by neck diameter, length, and angulation. In addition, iliac diameters and common iliac distal landing zone lengths were determined. Computerized 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was used to measure neck angulation and total aortic tortuosity. One hundred ninety-one patients were found to have AAAs with adequate CT scans for evaluation. Suitability for EVAR was highest in patients with AAA diameters of 3–4 cm and declined with increasing size of the AAA. Dividing AAAs into sizes greater than or less than 5.5 cm revealed that small AAAs had significantly longer necks, less neck angulation, longer common iliac landing zones, and less total aortic tortuosity. Multivariable analysis revealed that maximal aortic diameter was the only independent predictor of suitability for EVAR (p = 0.005, odds ratio 1.67, CI 95% = 1.17 to 2.38). The odds ratio predicts that with each 1 cm increase in size, the likelihood of suitability decreased by 5.3-fold. Small AAAs have less complex anatomy with longer aortic necks, less neck angulation, and less tortuosity. The poor outcomes following the treatment of large AAAs is thought to be due to complex anatomy. EVAR of less anatomically challenging small AAAs may improve longterm outcomes.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 5, 381-391 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900502


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. J. Wang and J. P. Carpenter EVAR in Small Versus Large Aneurysms: Does Size Influence Outcome? Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, June 1, 2009; 43(3): 244 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]