SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by McKinsey, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by McKinsey, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Endovascular Solutions to Complications of Open Aortic Repair

Benjamin J. Pearce, MD

Zachary Baldwin, MD

Hisham Bassiouny, MD

Bruce L. Gewertz, MD

James F. McKinsey, MD

Chicago, IL

Open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) or occlusive disease can be complicated by pseudoaneurysm formation and aneurysmal dilatation of native vessels. Reports of reoperation for these new lesions have a mortality rate of 5–17% electively, and 24–88% if ruptured. These complications are commonly several years after initial repair, and progression of other comorbidities can further complicate a repeat exploration. The authors reviewed 5 cases of late complications of open aortic bypass surgery treated with endovascular stent grafting as an alternative to reexploration in patients with increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Over a 6-year experience, 5 patients underwent endovascular stent grafting to repair paraanastomotic aneurysms. Patient records were reviewed and clinical cardiac risk evaluation was performed. Follow-up clinic notes and computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated. Between October 1996 and February 2002, 5 patients underwent 6 endovascular procedures to repair paraanastomotic aneurysms. Mean period between interventions was 16.6 ±6.27 years (range 10–25); mean age at endovascular procedure 74.2 ±6.37 years (range 67–84). Cardiac clinical risk index increased in 80% of patients by Goldman Risk Index and in 40% by the Modified Cardiac Risk Index. On completion angiography, there was complete exclusion of the paraanastomotic aneurysms in all cases (100%). Length of postoperative stay was 1.5 ±0.547 days. Mean estimated blood loss at conclusion of endovascular procedure was 577 ±546.504 cc (range, 60 cc–1,500 cc). Mean follow-up was 24.4 ±24.593 months (range, 5–67 months). On repeat imaging, all stent grafts remain patent without rupture or endoleak. Endovascular stent grafting to repair late complications of open AAA repair is a viable alternative to reexploration in patients with significant comorbidities. These procedures can be performed without violating the previous surgical planes of sites. The operations can be performed under local anesthesia and with reduced hospitalizations. In patients with increased risk factors, endovascular stent grafting is a less morbid alternative to open surgical techniques.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 3, 221-228 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement