This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, I. H. Articles by Zierler, B. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thomas, I. H. Articles by Zierler, B. K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Integrative Review of Outcomes in Patients with Acute Primary Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Following No Treatment or Treatment with Anticoagulation, Thrombolysis, or Surgical Algorithms

University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle

Brenda K. Zierler, PhD

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing, University of Washington School of Nursing and School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is a rare condition that typically affects young patients and can cause considerable long-term morbidity. Proposed treatments have included rest, heat, elevation of the affected limb, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, surgical decompression, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), and stenting. However, the optimal management of primary UEDVT remains controversial. This study was an integrative review of the English-language literature since 1965 on primary UEDVT, with comparison of long-term symptoms, rethrombosis, and pulmonary embolism in 4 treatment algorithms: rest, heat, and elevation alone; anticoagulation alone; surgical decompression without thrombolysis; and algorithms including thrombolysis. Forty-one studies describing 559 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Statistically significant differences were found among the 4 treatment algorithms in the incidence of residual symptoms (p< 0.000), the incidence of pulmonary embolism (p<0.000), and the incidence of rethrombosis (p<0.027). Residual symptoms and the severity of residual symptoms were greatest in the rest, heat, and elevation algorithm (74%), followed by the surgical (60%), anticoagulation (44%), and thrombolysis (22%) algorithms. Pulmonary embolism was also greatest in the rest, heat, and elevation algorithm (12%), followed by the anticoagulation (7%), thrombolysis (1%), and surgical algorithms (0%), while rethrombosis was greatest in the thrombolytic algorithm (7%) followed by the surgical (3%), anticoagulation (2%), and rest, heat, and elevation (0%) algorithms. These results support the current clinical practice of a staged, multidisciplinary approach to treatment of primary UEDVT that includes thrombolytic therapy and possible surgical decompression. Further studies are needed to evaluate the natural history of patients treated with thrombolysis alone, to assess the optimal timing of surgical decompression, and to determine the best use of PTA and stenting in the multidisciplinary approach.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 2, 163-174 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900206


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Kearon, S. R. Kahn, G. Agnelli, S. Goldhaber, G. E. Raskob, and A. J. Comerota Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 454S - 545S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]