This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ascher, E. Articles by Salles-Cunha, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ascher, E. Articles by Salles-Cunha, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Does Repeat Duplex Ultrasound for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Influence Patient Management?

Patrick S. DePippo, MD

A. Hingorani, MD

W. Yorkovich, RPA

S. Salles-Cunha, PhD

Brooklyn, NY

The clinical significance of lower extremity deep vein thrombus (DVT) propagation in the setting of anticoagulation therapy remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare results of thrombus outcome found with repeat duplex ultrasonography to the incidence of pulmonary embolism and mortality. During a recent 18-month period, 457 patients were diagnosed with lower extremity DVT with duplex ultrasonography and their data were retrospectively analyzed. Repeat examinations were available for review in 118 patients (51 men, 67 women). Results of repeat duplex exams were divided into 4 groups: resolved, improved, unchanged, or extended proximally. All patients received heparin and warfarin therapy. Ventilation-perfusion (V./Q.) scans were obtained only for signs and symptoms of pulmonary embolism (n=30). Mortality, the prevalence of high-probability V./Q. scans, frequency of intracaval-filter insertion, gender, mean age, mean prothrombin time (PT), mean partial thromboplastin time (PTT), mean number of repeat ultrasounds per patient, and mean time over which the repeat ultrasounds took place were compared among the 4 groups. Patients who had proximal extension of DVT (19%) on repeat duplex ultrasound had an increased prevalence of pulmonary embolism (p<0.05). Also, patients whose DVT resolved were younger (p<0.05). There was no difference among the 4 groups in mortality, placement of Greenfield filters, mean PT, mean PTT, mean number of ultrasound exams per patient, or mean follow-up time over which the exams took place. Proximal extension of DVT documented by repeat duplex ultrasound is a significant risk factor for pulmonary embolism. Repeat duplex ultrasound can identify a group of patients who may benefit from insertion of an intracaval filter device.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 6, 525-531 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440403800606


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?