SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Surowiec, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Surowiec, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, M. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Endovascular Management of Central Venous Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patient: Results of Percutaneous Therapy

Scott M. Surowiec, MD

Allison J. Fegley, MD

William J. Tanski, MD

Nayan Sivamurthy, MD

Karl A. Illig, MD

David E. Lee, MD

Rochester, NY

David L. Waldman, MD

Center For Vascular Disease, Interventional Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Richard M. Green, MD

Rochester, NY

Mark G. Davies, MD, PhD

University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave Box 652, Rochester, NY 14642 mark_davies{at}urmc.rochester.edu

The purpose of this study was to determine the functional results of transvenous angioplasty for the treatment of central venous stenoses in patients with failing upper extremity arteriovenous access. Two hundred consecutive patients presented with threatened arteriovenous access from January 1999 through July 2002. Angiographic evidence of central venous stenosis was present in 35 patients (18%) (superior vena cava 5, brachiocephalic veins 14, and subclavian veins 18). Follow-up averaged 873 days from the date of initial intervention. The initial technical success rate was 89%. Primary patency for each intervention was 85% at 30 days, 55% at 6 months, 43% at 1 year, and 0% at 2 years. Assisted primary patency rates were 88% at 30 days, 80% at 1 year, and 64% at 2 years. Freedom from central venous dialysis catheter placement was 82% at 30 days, 63% at 3 months, 51% at 1 year, 37% at 2 years, and 25% at 3 years. Freedom from a dialysis catheter was superior in those patients with autogenous arteriovenous fistulas. Transvenous angioplasty appears to be beneficial for hemodialysis patients with central venous stenoses, and it helps preserve functional access in the affected extremity, particularly in patients with autogenous fistulas.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 4, 349-354 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440403800407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
U. Ozyer, A. Harman, E. Yildirim, C. Aytekin, F. Karakayali, and F. Boyvat
Long-Term Results of Angioplasty and Stent Placement for Treatment of Central Venous Obstruction in 126 Hemodialysis Patients: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1672 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement