This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Garcìa-Pajares, R. Articles by Solìs, J. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Garcìa-Pajares, R. Articles by Solìs, J. V. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Diabetic Kidney Problems Dialysis Kidney Failure Hazardous Substances DB TEFLON Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Upper Arm Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts for Dialysis Access. Analysis of Two Different Graft Sizes: 6 mm and 6–8 mm

Division of Vascular Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MaraòÛn, Madrid, Spain; Angiologìa y Cirugìa Vascular (Area 3400), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MaraòÛn, Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain vascular{at}hggm.es

Josè R. Polo, MD, PhD

Vascular Access Unit, Madrid, Spain

¡ngel Flores, MD

Enrique Gonzalez-Tabares, MD, PhD

Juan V. Solìs, MD, PhD

Division of Vascular Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MaraòÛn, Madrid, Spain

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze 2 sizes of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) upper arm grafts for dialysis: 8 millimeters, tapered to 6 mm at the arterial side, and 6 millimeters. All upper arm PTFE grafts (Gore-Tex®) were performed between January 1981 and April 1997. Patient characteristics, complication rate, and patency rates were compared for both kind of grafts. Five hundred and seven PTFE grafts were analyzed (183 6-mm grafts and 324 6- to 8-mm grafts). Early failure was found in 5 grafts (2.7%) in 6-mm grafts, and in 5 grafts (1.5%) in 8-mm grafts (not significant). Steal syndrome was found in 1 patient (0.5%) of the 6-mm group, and in 11 (3.4%) of the 8-mm grafts (p=0.085). The rate of late complications requiring surgical repair was 0.56 episode per graft-year in the 6-mm grafts group, and 0.33 in the 8-mm grafts (p<0.001). Primary patency rates of 6-mm grafts were 72%, 33%, and 19% at 1, 3, and 5 years; and secondary patency rates were 86%, 68%, 56%, and 44% at 1, 3, 5, and 6 years, respectively. In the 8-mm grafts group, primary patency rates were 77%, 52%, and 39% at 1, 3, and 5 years; and secondary patency rates were 92%, 84%, 73%, and 66% at 1, 3, 5, and 6 years, respectively. Comparison of patency rates of 6-mm and 8-mm grafts were statistically significant (p< 0.001) for both primary and secondary curves. However, secondary survival curves were similar for both kind of grafts in a subpopulation of diabetic patients. The authors conclude that the 8-mm graft, tapered to 6 mm at the arterial side, is a dialysis graft with fewer complications and a better patency rate than grafts of 6 mm placed in the same anatomical position, at least in a population of nondiabetic patients. Steal syndrome was observed in some cases of diabetic and older patients with a large-bore graft. Thus, this kind of prosthesis should be avoided in this population. On the other hand, this is not a prospective, randomized study made with any intention for comparison. Therefore, the aforementioned conclusions must be cautiously considered.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 5, 335-343 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440303700505


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?