This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kasper, G. C. Articles by Welling, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kasper, G. C. Articles by Welling, R. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Clinical Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy Based on Duplex Ultrasonography

John J. Cranley Vascular Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH

Joann M. Lohr, MD

John J. Cranley Vascular Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH; Good Samaritan Hospital, 375 Dixmyth Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45220 Wendy_thompson{at}trihealth.com

Richard E. Welling, MD

Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH

Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of stroke caused by carotid artery stenosis in selected patients. Limiting the morbidity and costs of this process without increasing the risks should further improve the benefits of this procedure. Results were prospectively collected from 123 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed at a community teaching hospital. All patients underwent duplex ultrasonography for preoperative evaluation. Catheter angiography was used on a selective basis. Preferential use of regional anesthetic and selective use of the intensive care unit were applied. The mortality, morbidity, complications, and costs were then compared for the group receiving only preoperative duplex ultrasonography with those undergoing catheter angiography preoperatively. Age, comorbid risk factors, indications for carotid endarterectomy, and incidence of stroke were similar in both patient groups. The rates of mortality, morbidity, and stroke for carotid endarterectomy were low (mortality 0%, morbidity 6.5%, stroke 0.8%). For preoperative evaluation all patients underwent duplex ultrasonography (100%) and 28 (23%) underwent preoperative catheter angiography in addition to duplex ultrasonography. The complication rate associated with catheter angiography was 6/28 (21%). Complications included groin hematoma (7%), pseudoaneurysm (3.6%), bradycardia (7%), and unstable angina (3.6%). Costs for duplex ultrasonography averaged $165 and additional costs incurred by the use of catheter angiography averaged $4,200. Intraoperative assessment of the carotid endarterectomy site did not change based on the use of preoperative catheter angiography. Morbidity, mortality, and stroke rates were the same for the 2 groups. The preoperative use of duplex ultrasonography for the sole evaluation in carotid endarterectomy is well established. The use of preoperative catheter angiography is still preferred by a subset of surgeons. The use of catheter angiography is associated with significant morbidity and additional costs when compared to performing carotid endarterectomy based solely on preoperative duplex ultrasonography. The added costs and morbidity of angiography increase the societal cost of this procedure without significant clinical improvement in patient outcome.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 5, 323-327 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440303700503


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?