This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Skelly, C. L. Articles by Schwartz, L. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Skelly, C. L. Articles by Schwartz, L. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Routine Early Postoperative Duplex Scanning is Unnecessary Following Uncomplicated Carotid Endarterectomy

Shari L. Meyerson, MD

Michael A. Curi, MD, MPA

Tina R. Desai, MD

Hisham S. Bassiouny, MD

James F. Mckinsey, MD

Bruce L. Gewertz, MD

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Lewis B. Schwartz, MD

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago MC 5028, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 lschwart{at}surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu

Although early postoperative duplex scanning has become routine after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), it is unclear whether the results of these scans alter clinical management. The purpose of this study was to critically examine the usefulness of early postoperative duplex scans in evaluating the ipsilateral carotid artery (for technical perfection) as well as the contralateral carotid artery (for potential velocity changes after improvements in ipsilateral flow). Consecutive patients undergoing CEA between January 1995 and June 1999 in a tertiary hospital setting were studied. Patients underwent early postoperative duplex scanning according to the discretion of the operating surgeon and the availability of the patient. In 212 patients 236 CEAs were performed with selective use of patch closure (49%), intraluminal shunting (19%), and intraoperative completion imaging studies (1 4%). Neurologic complications included 3 transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (1.3%), 3 nondisabling strokes (1.3%), and 3 disabling strokes (1.3%). There was 1 30-day death from myocardial infarction. Patients were followed up for a median of 18 months (range 0-72 months). Sixty-five percent of patients undergoing uncomplicated CEA (147/227) underwent early duplex surveillance within 6 months of operation. Unsuspected sonographic abnormalities were discovered in 8 patients (5%), including 7 cases of mild internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (> 50% by velocity criteria) and 1 case of common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis (intimal flap). None of the patients with ICA stenosis developed symptoms or required operation at any time. The CCA intimal flap was electively repaired without complication. Postoperative changes in velocity in the contralateral ICA were found in 8/48 (17%) cases. There were 3 cases of increased velocity, upgrading 1 from 0-49% to 50-79% stenosis and upgrading 2 from 50-79% to 80-99% stenosis. The latter patients both underwent uneventful contralateral CEA. There were 6 cases of decreased velocity, resulting in downgrading of stenoses from 50-79% to 0-49% (n = 5) or from 80-99% to 50-79% (n = 1). Only the latter patient underwent contralateral CEA; the remainder have been followed up without intervention. Early scanning appeared to offer no clinical benefit; survival and neurologic outcome were the same in the 135 patients scanned within the first 6 months as in the 68 patients whose first postoperative scan occurred later (4-year neurologic event rate 0% in both groups; patient survival with early duplex 98 ± 1.5%, without early duplex 96 ±2.6%; p = NS). Early ipsilateral duplex abnormalities following CEA are infrequent in asymptomatic patients and, even if found, rarely alter management. Patients with bilateral stenosis being considered for contralateral CEA should undergo repeat duplex scanning after the first operation, because of the significant rate (19%) of contralateral velocity changes induced by ipsilateral CEA.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 2, 115-122 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440203600206


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?