This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wolpert, L. M. Articles by Drezner, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wolpert, L. M. Articles by Drezner, A. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Deep Vein Thrombosis MRI Scans Peripheral Arterial Disease Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Magnetic Resonance Venography in the Diagnosis and Management of May-Thurner Syndrome

Omid Rahmani, MD

Department of Surgery, Connecticut Vascular Institute, Hartford, CT

Barry Stein, MD

Department of Radiology, Connecticut Vascular Institute, Hartford, CT

James J. Gallagher, MD

Department of Surgery, Connecticut Vascular Institute, Hartford, CT

A. David Drezner, MD, PhD

Connecticut Vascular Institute, 85 Seymour Street, Suite 911, Hartford, CT 06102

Isolated left lower extremity swelling secondary to left iliac vein compression was first described by McMurrich in 1908, and defined anatomically by May and Thurner in 1957 and clinically by Cockett and Thomas in 1965. The left iliac vein is usually located posterior to the right iliac artery and can be compressed between the artery and the fifth lumbar vertebrae. Symptoms include left lower extremity edema, pain, varicosities, venous stasis changes, and deep venous thrombosis. Evaluation of these patients historically included a venous duplex scan to rule out deep venous thrombosis and an abdominal computed tomography scan to rule out pelvic mass. This paper describes the use of magnetic resonance imaging and venography in the evaluation of patients with isolated left lower extremity swelling. A retrospective analysis of a series of 24 patients who presented with symptomatic left lower extremity edema was performed. Infrainguinal deep venous thrombosis and valvular reflux was evaluated by duplex scan. The presence of suprainguinal deep venous thrombosis and pelvic mass was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to define the anatomic characteristics of the May-Thurner syndrome. Patients identified with the syndrome were treated either conservatively with lower extremity compression and elevation or with angioplasty and stenting. Follow-up of this subset of patients was performed with clinical assessment of the resolution of their symptomatic lower extremity edema as well as quality of life assessments via phone interviews. Twenty-four patients were evaluated for isolated left lower extremity swelling. Seven patients had positive results on duplex scans for deep venous thrombosis. Magnetic resonance imaging results demonstrated 1/24 (4%) had a pelvic mass compressing the iliac vein; 2/24 (8%) patients had iliac vein thrombosis; 1/24 (4%) patients with a history of deep venous thrombosis demonstrated a long stenotic segment of the left iliac vein unrelated to its association with the right iliac artery; 9/24 patients (37%) had anatomic evidence of May-Thurner syndrome; and 2/24 patients (8%) had isolated left lower extremity swelling of unknown etiology. Five patients diagnosed with May-Thurner syndrome were treated conservatively with compression stockings and leg elevation. Four patients with May-Thurner syndrome underwent iliac vein angioplasty and stenting. Technical success was 100%. On clinical follow-up, the patients with May-Thurner syndrome have had improvement/resolution of their symptoms. There have been no complications from either therapy. May-Thurner syndrome is a clinical entity of left iliac vein compression by the right iliac artery, resulting in isolated left lower extremity swelling and may be a precipitating factor for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best modality for diagnosis of this entity as it can rule out the presence of pelvic masses and deep venous thrombosis while simultaneously demonstrating the anatomy characteristic of this syndrome.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 1, 51-57 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440203600109


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Ludwig, T. Han, and D. Amundson Postthrombotic Syndrome Complicating a Case of May-Thurner Syndrome Despite Endovascular Therapy: Case Report and Review Chest, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1382 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sharaf Recurrent left-leg venous thrombosis in a woman despite a therapeutic international normalized ratio Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 25, 2005; 173(9): 1032 - 1032. [Full Text] [PDF]