SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyerson, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meyerson, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relationship Between Preoperative Duplex Vein Mapping and Intraoperative Longitudinal Impedance in Infrainguinal Vein Grafts

Shari L. Meyerson, MD

Umar M. Shakur, BA

Christopher L. Skelly, MD

Francis Loth, PhD

James F. McKinsey, MD

Lewis B. Schwartz, MD

Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

The importance of favorable vein size, resistance, and impedance for the sustained success of infrainguinal vein grafting procedures has repeatedly been demonstrated. Estimating these properties preoperatively, however, has been problematic. Ultrasonic vein mapping is a reliable technique for measuring vein diameters at venous pressures, but it is unknown whether these data accurately assess the resistive potential of the conduit in the arterial circulation. The purpose of this study was to compare vein diameter measured preoperatively with vein graft longitudinal impedance measured intraoperatively.

Patients who had undergone both preoperative vein mapping and intraoperative impedance studies at the time of infrainguinal bypass were included (December 1995-April 1999). Vein mapping was performed using B-mode ultrasound with a 10 MHz probe. The dimensions of the specific vein segment used for reconstruction were tabulated and its mean diameter (D) was calculated. At the time of operation, following reconstruction, transgraft blood pressure gradient ({delta}P) and blood flow (Q) waveforms were recorded by using digital data acquisition. Longitudinal impedance (ZL) was calculated as {delta}P/Q at each harmonic following Fourier transformation and the area under the curve from 0 to 4 Hz designated as {int}ZL.

Twenty-three bypasses in 22 patients were studied (D = 3.5 ±0.2 mm, range 1.6-5.5 mm; {int}ZL= 37 ±4 x 103 dyne cm-5, range 13-95 X 103 dyne cm-5). D significantly correlated with {int}ZL (slope = -0.454, p < 0.05), albeit with a fairly low correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.23). D > 3.6 mm was predictive of graft patency at 12 months (D > 3.6 mm 100% vs D < 3.6 mm 57 ±20%; p = 0.02).

Larger veins identified by preoperative mapping have, in general, more favorable intraoperative resistive characteristics as defined by a lower JZL. However, some veins thought to have small diameters (< 3.6 mm) may still demonstrate sufficiently low {int}ZL when grafted to remain patent.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 5, 393-402 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/153857440003400503


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement