This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kostakis, A. Articles by Tzortzis, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kostakis, A. Articles by Tzortzis, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Use of Modified Umbilical Vein Graft as Vascular Access in Chronic Hemodialysis

John Bokos, MD

Stelios Kyriakidis, MD

Demetrios Stamatiadis, MD

Fragiska Sigala, MD

George Vaiopoulos, MD

George Tzortzis, MD

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, "Laikon" General Hospital, Athens, Greece

The selection of material of an arteriovenous graft employed for maintenance hemodialysis when natural veins are lacking is of major importance for its patency rate because of rough handling during hemodialysis, because of multiple needling, and because of other risk factors related to the patient's physical condition. The authors studied 148 umbilical vein grafts implanted in the last 7 years in 123 patients for maintenance hemodialysis. During a 3-year follow up, 83 grafts were lost because of a total number of 137 complications in 103 grafts, despite the invasive and noninvasive attempts at graft rescue. The most frequent cause of graft loss was thrombosis, observed in 87 grafts, causing graft loss in 57. The remaining 50 complications observed were bleeding in seven, aneurysm formation in six, infection in 16, and venostasis or steal syndrome in 21 grafts. Twenty-four of these were rescued, while seven patient deaths were seen with functioning graft. The good biocompatibility of the umbilical vein grafts allowed for multiple interventional and surgical procedures toward graft rescue, which prolonged patency rate. The cumulative patency rate was 72.2 ± 5.9%, 54.4 ± 6.2%, and 31.7 ± 9.2% for the first, second, and third year, respectively. The patency rate is considered satisfactory in view of the prolonged time under hemodialysis and the advanced age of the patients of our study.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 33, No. 4, 373-379 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449903300407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?