SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madera, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calcagno, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Madera, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calcagno, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Carotid Replacement Grafts for Extracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Freddy A. Madera, MD

Richard A. Razzino, MD

Paul M. Orecchia, MD

David Calcagno, MD

PinnacleHealth Hospitals, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Carotid artery reconstruction using interposition grafts is usually indicated for management of recurrent stenosis where endarterectomy cannot be performed, where quality of the carotid artery is unsatisfactory following endarterectomy, or where there are aneurysmal changes in the artery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perioperative and long-term results in patients who underwent carotid replacement grafts.

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of 758 operations performed for extracranial carotid disease between August 1987 and February 1995. In 10 of these cases, the quality of the carotid artery following endarterectomy was so thin or had such an irregular surface that replacement grafts were necessary.

In three of these 10 patients, surgery had been performed for recurrent carotid stenosis. Autogenous vein was utilized in seven cases, and prosthetic material was used in three cases (polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE] in two cases and Dacron in one case). Follow-up was complete in all patients and ranged from 16 to 87 months (mean, 47 months). Serial duplex scans were performed in all cases. All grafts remained patent, but duplex scanning detected severe stenosis in two of the 10 grafts at 7 and 39 months, respectively, after the initial reconstruction. In both cases, contrast angiography confirmed the findings. In both patients, the areas of stenosis occurred in the midportion of a reversed vein graft at a valve site. The stenoses were corrected without further restenosis. There were no postoperative stenoses in the three cases where prosthetic material was used. There were no early or late strokes or deaths.

The late secondary patency of carotid artery replacement grafts is excellent. Intraoperative detection and ablation of venous valves or choosing a vein segment without valves when autologous grafts are used may decrease the incidence of secondary stenosis. Serial duplex scanning is recommended for both short-term and long-term follow-up.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 5, 479-483 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449803200513


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement