SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P. E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schepens, M. A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P. E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schepens, M. A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Long-Term Clinical and Duplex Follow-up After Proximal Vertebral Artery Reconstruction

Paul E. Y. Van Schil

Departments of Vascular Surgery and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

Robert G. A. Ackerstaff

Departments of Vascular Surgery and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

Freddy E. E. Vermeulen

Departments of Vascular Surgery and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

Bert C. Eikelboom

Departments of Vascular Surgery and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

Marc A. A. Schepens

Departments of Vascular Surgery and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

From 1977 to 1989, 28 patients, 18 men and 10 women, underwent 29 proximal vertebral artery reconstructions. Indications were vertebrobasilar insufficiency in 17 patients and TIA or stroke in 6. Five were asymptomatic. Procedures performed were endarterectomy in 20, reimplantation in 5, venous bypass in 3, and decompression in 1 case. Concomitant procedures were coronary artery bypass grafting (6) and carotid, subclavian, or innominate artery revascularization (14).

There was no operative mortality. There were 3 early reoperations for occlusion, bleeding, and lymph fistula, respectively.

Except for 1 foreign patient recent clinical follow-up was complete. Mean follow-up was 85.6 months (range 17-146). During follow-up 10 patients died. Causes were mainly cardiac (3), carcinoma (3), and stroke (2). Seventeen patients were alive, 13 had no cerebrovascular symptoms, 2 sustained a hemispherical stroke, 1 was only slightly improved, and 1 had a drop attack 131 months after operation. Five and ten-year actuarial survival rates were 85% and 51% respectively.

Follow-up with duplex scan was available in 26 patients and was complete in 24. Mean duplex follow-up was 78.6 months (range 3-146). Significant abnormalities were noted in 6 but with symptoms in only 1 patient. Mean time to restenosis was 77.3 months. Late angiographic control in 10 patients correlated well with duplex findings.

Proximal vertebral artery reconstruction yields good clinical long-term results, and duplex scan is a useful tool in the follow-up of these patients.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 7, 471-479 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449402800705


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement