SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franko, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Xiang Wang
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franko, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Xiang Wang,
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ideal Measurement of Cardiac Output: Is Impedance Cardiography the Answer?

Edward R. Franko, M.D.

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York

Joseph M. Van De Water, M.D.

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York

Xiang Wang, Ph.D.

Drexel University of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The ideal measurement of cardiac output (CO) would be a system that is ac curate, noninvasive, reproducible, continuous, and technician-free. Impedence cardiography (ICG) has the promise of meeting these criteria. The authors have developed a unique ICG system that analyzes the analog signals from an impe dence cardiograph by an original software program. This was compared against standard thermodilution (TD) measurement of CO (CO TD) in patients in the in tensive care and heart surgical units.

Simultaneous measurements by COTD and by COICG were performed in 65 patients. A good correlation was noted between COTD and COICG over a range of 2.4 to 9.7 L/min (r = 0.73, p < 0.002). If patients with factors known to inter fere with ICG were excluded, an improved correlation was found (r = 0.89, p < .002). COICG followed a similar trend as COTD even in these excluded pa tients. The reproducibility of the COICG was good (coefficient of variation = 0.071).

The COICG was found to be simple and automatic. The results show that it is reproducible and correlates well with COTD. It also has the added advantages of being continuous and noninvasive. Factors such as arrhythmias, severe COPD, and mitral regurgitation were found to interfere with the COICG values. Over all, the versatility of. COICG gives the promise of very good noninvasive monitoring in critical care units and preoperative evaluation in the outpatient setting.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 7, 550-558 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449102500706


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement