This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Luks, F. I. Articles by LaMaute, H. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Luks, F. I. Articles by LaMaute, H. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Reappraisal of Exclusion Angiography in Gunshot Wounds of the Extremities

Department of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Mary Immaculate Hospital Division, New York, New York

Daniel L. Picard

Department of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Mary Immaculate Hospital Division, New York, New York

Walter F. Pizzi

Department of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Mary Immaculate Hospital Division, New York, New York

Steven A. Battaglia

Department of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Mary Immaculate Hospital Division, New York, New York

Henry R. LaMaute

Department of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Mary Immaculate Hospital Division, New York, New York

The routine use of exclusion angiography in trauma to the extremities has resulted in varying percentages of negative studies, mostly because of a great variability in location and type of injury.

The authors reviewed 117 low-velocity gunshot wounds to the extremities. Twenty-six cases presented with hard signs of vascular injury and underwent immediate exploration. Ninety-one exclusion angiograms were performed (11 for soft signs and 80 for proximity only), 89 (98%) were considered negative. Two cases (2 % ) that presented without hard signs required vascular repair. Physical examination alone was 93 % sensitive and 99 % specific for recognition of vascular injuries. Routine angiography did not substantially improve the diagnostic accuracy and had a positive predictive value of only 2%.

The authors conclude that angiography may be safely omitted in low-velocity gunshot wounds to the extremities if the absence of signs or symptoms of vascular injury can be firmly established.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 4, 295-300 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449102500407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?