SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolachalam, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Julian, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kolachalam, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Julian, T. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Presentation of Thrombosed Greenfield Filters

Ramachandra B. Kolachalam

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Montefiore Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Thomas B. Julian

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Montefiore Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

The tour de force of this paper lies in the review of clinical presentation of occluded Greenfield filters in a group of patients contraindicated for postopera tive anticoagulation. Nine of 59 patients (15.3%) had occluded filters. Eight of these 9 patients (88.8%) had primary brain tumors. This study, for the first time, to the authors' knowledge, reports a high incidence of caval thrombosis in brain tumor patients (8/31:25.8%) and of an association between caval throm bosis and recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was seen in 88.8% of patients with caval thrombosis in this service. It is the authors' contention that recurrent DVT, at least in brain tumor patients, should alert the physician to evaluate caval patency. Caval thrombosis was noticed even sixty weeks after the placement of Greenfield filter. The authors conclude, therefore, that brain tumor patients had a high incidence of occluded filters; lower extrem ity morbidity provided a clue to such an event, and such a scenario should raise concerns regarding caval patency, even in long-term follow-up.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 9, 666-670 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449002400907


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement