SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lefemine, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Broach, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lefemine, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Broach, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Noninvasive Imaging and Frequency Analysis for Carotid Artery Diagnosis and Surgical Decisions

Armand A. Lefemine

Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Quillen-Dishner College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee

James Broach

Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Quillen-Dishner College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee

An analysis of 212 carotid arteries studied by Doppler imaging, B-mode imaging, and spectral analysis reveals poor correlation though similarity of data base by chi-square and gamma is strong. The differences between arteriogra phy and the noninvasive techniques appear mainly in the categories of normal and > 50% stenosis. Arteriography classifies more patients as normal and non invasives classify more patients as > 50% by a ratio of 2:1. Noninvasive studies can be used to verify the findings using multiple techniques without risk and correlate best with operative findings. Evidence indicates that multimodality noninvasive studies are a reliable way of diagnosing carotid bifurcation disease and may be used in place of arteriography.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 3, 161-166 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/153857449002400303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement