SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanfelippo, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sanfelippo, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Experience with an Alternate Prosthesis for Chronic Vascular Access

Peter M. Sanfelippo

Ohio Heart & Thoracic Surgery Center, Inc. Columbus, Ohio

Although chronic hemodialysis has been employed for more than twenty-five years, the perfect ap proach to chronic vascular access has yet to be realized. The standard ra dial-cephalic fistulae, although suc cessful in a majority of patients, may not provide suitable vascular access. Their failure may be due to paucity of forearm veins, patient's obesity, or lack of patent veins.

Among the alternatives is the car bon transcutaneous access device (CTAD). This paper discusses the four-year experience of one surgeon with the CTAD.

Over a four-year period, the CTAD was utilized in 13 selected pa tients. The selection of these patients was based on the failure of many other access techniques. Prior to CTAD, the patients had had from two to fourteen access procedures. The CTADs have provided four to fifty months of satisfactory access.

Of the 13 patients, 6 have expired with functional CTADS. Four pa tients have had the CTADs removed. One was removed at thirty-two months when it was decided to con vert this patient to peritoneal dialysis after satisfactory access with the CTAD. Another was removed after four months in a patient who opted to switch to peritoneal dialysis. One was removed at nineteen months after failed function, and one was removed after eight months because of Can dida sepsis.

The other 3 patients are living with functional CTADs in use, the longest being in operation fifty months.

The major problem has been the formation of a ball-valve thrombus at the base of the port. A nonoperative approach has been successful in re moval of this thrombus.

The selection of site for the CTAD is of importance for patient conven ience and for longevity of function. The experience in this pilot group of patients with the CTAD followed up to fifty months on dialysis has proved the CTAD to be a significant tool in the armamentarium of the vascular access surgeon.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 5, 311-315 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/153857448802200504


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement