SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robicsek, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robicsek, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pitfalls in the Application of Residual Coronary Pressure Gradient (RCPG) as an Indicator of Success or Failure of Transluminal Coronary Balloon Angioplasty

Francis Robicsek

Heineman Medical Research Laboratory, Charlotte Memorial Hospital and Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

While the measurement of residual trans-stenotic coronary pressure gradi ent (CPRG) in the course of balloon angioplasty is a procedure of practical value in both estimating the severity of the stenosis and the degree of improve ment achieved, its application, however, has also several and serious sources of error; therefore, its value is limited and it should never be accepted as an out-of- context single indicator to either the degree of the stricture or of the anatomic improvement induced by angioplasty.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 5, 313-322 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/153857448501900502


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement