This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Calcagno, D. Articles by Ha, C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Calcagno, D. Articles by Ha, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effect of Saphenous Vein Diameter on Closure Rate With ClosureFAST Radiofrequency Catheter

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vasculardoctor{at}comcast.net.

	Abstract

Purpose: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of veins >12 mm in diameter has been a controversial subject since the first-generation device was submitted for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Veins >12 mm were excluded in the initial study. Many insurance carriers used >12 mm size as reason to not approve the procedure. As the concept of tumescent anesthesia was better communicated, RFA was used for large veins. The 12-mm size limit was not used in the studies for the newer ClosureFAST catheter approval, yet remains in force with some insurance companies. Our objective was to determine whether vein diameter >12 mm had effect on closure rates with the ClosureFAST catheter.

Methods: ClosureFAST RFA was used to eliminate saphenous reflux in consecutive cases in 1 center. Retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively gathered data. Veins were divided into 12 mm diameter (group A) or >12 mm diameter (group B). Duplex scans were scheduled for 2 to 5 days and 6 months postprocedure.

Results: A total of 338 great and small saphenous veins were treated, 246 saphenous veins in group A (mean 8 ± 2 mm) and 96 in group B (mean 17 ± 4 mm). Early duplex showed complete closure in 231 veins in group A (94%) and 92 veins in group B (96%; NS). The remaining veins showed partial closure with none showing retrograde flow. Six-month duplex scans were completed in 155 veins. Complete closure was seen in 110 veins in group A (98%) and 43 veins in group B (100%; NS). All veins partially open on early scan had closed by 6 months. The 2 veins open at 6 months in group A were closed on initial scan.

Conclusions: Vein diameter >12 mm had no effect on closure rate with the ClosureFAST catheter.

First published on October 14, 2009
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2009, doi:10.1177/1538574409345026


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?