This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Met, R. Articles by Vries, J.-P. d. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Met, R. Articles by Vries, J.-P. d. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Functional Results After Through-Knee and Above-Knee Amputations: Does More Length Mean Better Outcome?

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.met{at}amc.uva.nl.

	Abstract

The objective was to evaluate our results on functional outcome for both through-knee amputations and above-knee amputations. Functional outcome was measured using the Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine score, which focuses on walking distance and use of prosthesis. From 1997 to 2006, 39 through-knee amputations (53%) and 34 above-knee amputations (47%) were performed. Eight (21%) of 39 through-knee amputations needed to be converted to above-knee amputations. Fifty patients (24 above-knee amputations, 26 through-knee amputations) were eligible for follow-up. During follow-up, 71% (of above-knee amputations) and 69% (of through-knee amputations) did not walk with a prosthesis, and 29% of above-knee amputations and 27% of through-knee amputations walked more or less than 50 m. In conclusion, only a minority of patients is able to walk with a prosthesis, and a lot of the through-knee amputations need conversion to a higher level. On the basis of this results, it would be preferable to perform a straight above-knee amputation instead of a through-knee amputation if the correct amputation level is in doubt in high-risk patients.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?